I LIKE TO EAT SHIT!!!!

They joke about it online like it’s just shock humor, a dare, a “don’t kink-shame me” punchline. Someone says they like to eat shit, and the room splits instantly: half disgusted, half laughing, half pretending it’s normal because nobody wants to be the only person acting human anymore.

But here’s the darker take: what if it isn’t a joke, and it isn’t a kink.

What if it’s a stress-test.

Every influence system needs a calibration tool: a way to measure how far it can push a population before reality pushes back. Not with politics, not with religion, not with anything that has obvious stakes—because people resist those. You test compliance with something pointless, humiliating, and self-destructive, because the only reason anyone would agree is social pressure, algorithmic reinforcement, and the fear of being excluded.

So the theory goes: somewhere along the way, a behavioral program started seeding increasingly absurd “identity flags” into the culture—things that make no practical sense but create instant in-groups and out-groups. The point wasn’t the act itself. The point was the reaction. The point was to see whether the system could get people to publicly defend the indefensible, and to do it with confidence.

The real engine is the feed. It doesn’t care what the content is; it cares what the content does. Disgust is a high-voltage emotion. Disgust spikes attention, attention drives sharing, sharing trains the recommendation system, and the system learns that the fastest way to own your brain isn’t to persuade you—it’s to hijack your nervous system. Once you’re activated, you stop thinking in sentences and start thinking in signals: approve, reject, attack, defend, belong.

Now drop a taboo into that environment. Not a taboo with a clear moral debate, but a taboo so primal it bypasses language. The moment you see it, your body reacts before your mind forms an opinion. That’s the hook. And once you’ve hooked people, you can sort them into roles.

One group becomes the outraged enforcers. They keep the topic alive by screaming about it. Another group becomes the ironic defenders. They keep it alive by treating it like performance art. Another group becomes the “it’s not that big of a deal” crowd. They normalize it by flattening everything into relativism. You don’t need a majority to participate. You just need enough engagement to keep the algorithm feeding it oxygen.

Then comes the lever: public commitment.

If you can get someone to say, out loud, “Actually, this is fine,” about something their body knows is not fine, you’ve created a crack you can widen forever. Because after you defend one absurdity, the next one is easier. The brain hates admitting it was fooled, so it doubles down. It starts protecting the identity it just performed. What began as a joke becomes a badge. What began as a badge becomes a community. What began as a community becomes a channel you can steer.

That’s why, in this theory, the most important part isn’t the act. It’s the ritual around it: the attention, the outrage, the defenses, the purity tests, the reward of being “brave,” the punishment of being “judgmental,” the constant pressure to prove you’re not like the others. It’s a treadmill designed to convert shame into engagement.

And if you’re wondering who benefits, the answer is boring and terrifying: anyone who profits from a culture too distracted to focus. If people are arguing about the most degrading nonsense imaginable, they’re not organizing, building, learning, or resisting. They’re consuming, reacting, performing, and refreshing.

So the conspiracy isn’t “people secretly like disgusting things.”

The conspiracy is that the internet learned disgust is programmable, and someone decided to use it as a remote control—starting with the most extreme, humiliating signal possible, just to see how many people could be nudged into defending it… and how quickly everyone else could be trained to keep watching.

DMT, Lasers, and the Code Behind Reality: Are We Finally Seeing the Matrix?

Every few decades, humanity stumbles onto something that cracks open the edge of reality—just enough to make us wonder whether the world in front of us is actually what it seems. Lately, more and more people are coming forward with stories that push the boundaries of what science is willing to admit and what mainstream culture is ready to believe.

And the newest wave?
It isn’t UFOs.
It isn’t government mind-control.
It’s DMT, psychedelic states, and covert laser technologies that, when combined, appear to reveal something absolutely explosive:

The structure of the code behind our world—like we’re living in the Matrix.

DMT: The Molecule That Breaks the Simulation

For years, DMT has been quietly whispered about by psychonauts, shamans, researchers, and people who swear they’ve “seen behind the curtain.” They describe:

geometric grids

repeating symbols

machine-like entities

and a sense that the world is “rendered,” not built

Some insist the visions feel too precise, too engineered, and too computer-generated to be hallucinations.

But here’s where things get strange:

People in completely different parts of the world—who have never met, never compared notes, never studied quantum theory—report seeing almost the exact same patterns.

Patterns that look suspiciously like code.

Not metaphorical, philosophical code.
Literal rendering structures, like the world is stitched together through a programmable system of shapes, physics parameters, and digital scaffolding.

Lasers and the “Through-the-Wall” Phenomenon

While mainstream science denies it, military research papers (quietly published and quickly buried) describe laser systems capable of mapping rooms through walls using scattered photons. Nothing surprising there—governments always have toys decades ahead of the public.

But here’s the kicker:

Several independent researchers claim that when these laser frequencies interact with people under DMT or similar altered states, the visuals explode into something radically different.

People report:

seeing thin green or blue lines outlining objects

watching walls dissolve into pixel-like grids

perceiving animate “data streams” behind physical matter

experiencing the edge of rendered space, like a video game before textures load

One witness described it as “the universe showing you the wireframe mode.”

Another said, “It was like God hit CTRL + ALT + SHIFT + C and turned on the developer menu.”

Are Psychedelics the Developer Tools of the Universe?

Think about it.

If the universe were a simulation:

DMT could be the debug mode,

lasers could be the lighting engines,

and consciousness might be the interface connecting us to the source code.

This would also explain why:

DMT trips feel “more real than real”

matter looks like “organized information”

people describe the same geometric architecture

boundaries of time and space break down

entities in these states act like non-player characters with knowledge outside of human experience

Are these hallucinations?
Or glimpses into a higher-resolution version of reality that the sober mind can’t normally process?

The Growing Theory: We Are Not Seeing Visions — We Are Seeing the Software

A rising number of experiencers believe that consciousness under psychedelics doesn’t create fantasies—it tunes into the underlying operating system running our world.

What we see as atoms, particles, colors, and walls might just be the “user interface.”
Behind it? Pure structure. Pure code. Pure architecture.

And when the mind is in the right state, and the right frequency of light interacts with the environment…
the illusion slips.

You start to see the truth:

Matter is information.
Reality is rendered.
And we are living inside something far more engineered than we ever imagined.

So… Are We in the Matrix?

If you put all the testimonies together—psychonauts, physicists, military whistleblowers, laser researchers, and ordinary people who accidentally stumbled into the glitch—the picture starts to look eerily consistent.

There may not be a “room full of computers” creating the universe.
It may be far more advanced, far more elegant, and far more seamless than that.

But whatever is behind it…
it might be starting to show itself to us.

And the tools that reveal it aren’t supercomputers or particle colliders.

They’re ancient molecules, light, and the human mind.